Every bank screens its property book on the same engine, parameter set and scenario pathway and submits the standardised return; the supervisor sees the system-wide picture no single bank can — a peer league table on one yardstick, each bank's trajectory across reporting periods, a RAG status, the supervisor's top-down re-run that challenges self-reported adaptation, and the correlated single-event concentration. Click any bank to drill in and issue supervisory feedback. This is the comparability the Bank of Ghana Climate-Related Financial Risk Directive needs but leaves to each bank's method.
Run basis: parameter set BoG baseline v1 (2026-06) [baseline] · scenario SSP2-4.5 — Middle of the road · submission channel console (ORASS-ready) · as-of 2026-10-03. All submissions run the identical method, so the numbers are directly comparable.
* Illustrative — the single-event tail's regional event probabilities are screening assumptions, not empirically calibrated to Ghanaian event frequencies.
Across the banking sector, the share of exposure at High+ risk is easing ▼ -1.9pp over the submitted (as-reported) periods. This is the historical trend; the forward IPCC/NGFS scenarios (which rise) are shown per-bank in the drill-down. The aggregate can ease while individual banks are RED and worsening — which is why per-bank drill-down matters.
| # | Status | Bank | Assets | Exposure | % High+ | Trajectory | Top-down gap | Climate ECL/yr | PCAF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RED | Standard Chartered Bank Ghana Plc → | 150 | GHS 79.96M |
35.8% |
— flat |
−2pp unverified |
GHS 70k | 4.0 |
| 2 | RED | Fidelity Bank (Ghana) LTD → | 160 | GHS 80.90M |
35.3% |
— flat |
−18pp unverified |
GHS 58k | 4.0 |
| 3 | AMBER | Societe General Ghana Plc → | 121 | GHS 58.94M |
33.5% |
— flat |
−3pp unverified |
GHS 97k | 4.0 |
| 4 | AMBER | Bank of Africa Ghana Limited → | 100 | GHS 26.94M |
30.4% |
▼ -7pp |
— | GHS 22k | 4.0 |
| 5 | AMBER | GCB Bank Plc → | 192 | GHS 108.87M |
28.2% |
▼ -1pp |
−2pp unverified |
GHS 79k | 4.0 |
| 6 | AMBER | Prudential Bank Limited → | 100 | GHS 34.75M |
23.2% |
▼ -12pp |
— | GHS 31k | 4.0 |
| 7 | RED | Universal Merchant Bank Ghana LTD → | 105 | GHS 46.97M |
22.9% |
— flat |
−12pp unverified |
GHS 36k | 4.0 |
| 8 | AMBER | Consolidated Bank Ghana Limited → | 155 | GHS 97.19M |
22.3% |
▼ -1pp |
−2pp unverified |
GHS 98k | 4.0 |
| 9 | AMBER | Access Bank (Ghana) Plc → | 120 | GHS 56.90M |
21.9% |
— flat |
— | GHS 53k | 4.0 |
| 10 | AMBER | Agricultural Development Bank Plc → | 165 | GHS 103.99M |
21.4% |
— flat |
−4pp unverified |
GHS 205k | 4.0 |
| 11 | AMBER | Zenith Bank (Ghana) Limited → | 145 | GHS 117.26M |
21.0% |
— flat |
−2pp unverified |
GHS 194k | 4.0 |
| 12 | AMBER | United Bank for Africa (Ghana) Limited → | 124 | GHS 74.08M |
20.1% |
▲ +1pp |
−2pp unverified |
GHS 139k | 4.0 |
| 13 | GREEN | National Investment Bank PLC → | 100 | GHS 34.90M |
19.7% |
— flat |
— | GHS 34k | 4.0 |
| 14 | GREEN | First Atlantic Bank Limited → | 107 | GHS 44.05M |
19.5% |
▼ -3pp |
−4pp unverified |
GHS 61k | 4.0 |
| 15 | RED | OmniBSIC Bank Ghana LTD → | 117 | GHS 61.08M |
16.4% |
— flat |
−13pp unverified |
GHS 92k | 4.0 |
| 16 | GREEN | First National Bank (Ghana) Limited → | 110 | GHS 60.22M |
16.1% |
— flat |
−3pp unverified |
GHS 102k | 4.0 |
| 17 | RED | Absa Bank Ghana LTD → | 160 | GHS 120.85M |
15.1% |
— flat |
−10pp unverified |
GHS 129k | 4.0 |
| 18 | GREEN | Republic Bank (Ghana) PLC → | 120 | GHS 72.94M |
14.8% |
— flat |
−2pp unverified |
GHS 99k | 4.0 |
| 19 | GREEN | CalBank PLC → | 115 | GHS 73.75M |
10.6% |
— flat |
−1pp unverified |
GHS 62k | 4.0 |
| 20 | GREEN | First Bank (Ghana) LTD → | 100 | GHS 34.70M |
9.1% |
▼ -9pp |
— | GHS 19k | 4.0 |
| 21 | GREEN | Guaranty Trust Bank (Ghana) LTD → | 115 | GHS 60.07M |
9.0% |
▼ -9pp |
— | GHS 61k | 4.0 |
| 22 | GREEN | Stanbic Bank Ghana Limited → | 160 | GHS 123.08M |
7.2% |
▼ -3pp |
— | GHS 111k | 4.0 |
| 23 | GREEN | Ecobank Ghana Plc → | 175 | GHS 120.22M |
4.9% |
▼ -11pp |
— | GHS 96k | 4.0 |
Trajectory = % High+ across 2026-10-03 and the prior periods (▲ red = rising risk, ▼ green = falling). Top-down gap = how much higher the supervisor's evidence-only re-run puts the bank vs its own submission — a positive gap means the bank leans on self-reported adaptation. Click a row to drill in and issue feedback.
Regions where two or more banks each carry material High+ exposure — the correlated concentration a single severe flood or storm would hit across the sector simultaneously.